🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable results. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."